<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Two Brain Cells &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twobraincells.com/category/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twobraincells.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>As you can see</title>
		<link>http://www.twobraincells.com/2009/02/20/as-you-can-see/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twobraincells.com/2009/02/20/as-you-can-see/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accesibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twobraincells.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, a BBC News editor sends out internal memo asking presenters to read out web addresses, email addresses and phone numbers, rather than just saying &#8220;as you can see on your screens&#8221;, so that blind and other visually-impaired viewers can use them too.
The usual anti-PC crowd, as usual, gets the wrong message and decides that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a BBC News editor sends out internal memo asking presenters to read out web addresses, email addresses and phone numbers, rather than just saying &#8220;as you can see on your screens&#8221;, so that blind and other visually-impaired viewers can use them too.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23646277-details/BBC+newsreaders+told+to+read+out+phone+numbers/article.do">usual</a> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/4690314/BBC-newsreaders-told-to-read-out-phone-numbers-to-avoid-offending-the-blind.html">anti-PC</a> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1148892/BBC-newsreaders-told-read-ALL-phone-numbers--blind-people-offended.html">crowd</a>, as usual, gets the wrong message and decides that the BBC is banning the phrase &#8220;as you can see&#8221; because it might cause &#8216;offence&#8217; to blind people. The actual, simple motivation is, of course, accessibility &#8212; offending people never came into it.</p>
<p>The editor posts a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html">clarification</a> to his blog.</p>
<p>Cue hilarious comment thread where Joe Public struggles valiantly to deal with the concept that blind people might actually use computers in the 21st century.</p>
<p>Brickbats all round, but particularly to these stand-out comments:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=13832773">zsalya</a>: <em>People who are actually blind don&#8217;t make much use of URLs or email.</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment19">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=11997690">RelaxedSteak</a>: <em>How would a blind person be able to turn on a computer, open up a web browser find the navigation bar and type in bbc.co.uk or some other web address?</em> <a href="3:44pm">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=6456444">bringbackbiscan</a>: <em>this is going to sound insensitive, but what use is a url to a blind person? they wont be able to see the information anyway and surely the audio will only be of use on certain sites?</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment23">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=13838820">QantumBlip</a>: <em>What planet is the author of this article living on?
<p>I am all for improving disabled access to computers, I think computers can help disabled people a lot, but, let&#8217;s look at this issue objectively:</p>
<p>The specific complaint was that of television presenters not reading out the URL of websites and simply referring viewers to look at the URL presented on the television screen.</p>
<p>How useful is a website going to be to a blind person if they can&#8217;t even see the website in the first place!!</p>
<p>So what value is there in reading out aloud the web URL to blind people if they can&#8217;t even access the website!</p>
<p>Now whilst there are some text to speech conversion programs around, they&#8217;re only going to be of any use on websites which are very high in textual content, and then how can the blind person navigate around the website using hypertext links if they can&#8217;t even see those links in the first place!</p>
<p>The author clearly hasn&#8217;t thought through what he&#8217;s proposing.</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment109">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=13838820">QantumBlip</a>: <em>Someone please tell me, how a blind person can navigate a mouse around a webpage when they can&#8217;t see where the mouse is and can&#8217;t see where they want to place the mouse cursor.
<p>If they could achieve that, then they surely could drive a car from one town to another! Not sure the Police would be too happy about it.</p>
<p>Be realistic folks.</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment112">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=7853675">mrkcrtr</a>: <em>Surely, if a visually impaired person cannot see the URL on the TV screen then they will not be able to see the BBC website either?</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment116">#</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=13838855">JonL87</a>: <em>I have a simple question&#8230;if a blind person needs to have the URL spelled out on TV, how would they be able to read the website?</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment118">#</a></li>
</ul>
<p>And, among the few voices of reason, a bouquet to <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/profile?userid=2262022">TheRealCatherineO</a> for this wonderful remark:</p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m staggered at the comments that blind people don&#8217;t make much use of the TV, computers or email. What do they imagine they do all day? Weave baskets?</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/02/bbc_news_and_disabled_audience.html#comment42">#</a></p>
<p>Basket-weaving indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twobraincells.com/2009/02/20/as-you-can-see/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woooooo</title>
		<link>http://www.twobraincells.com/2007/09/07/woooooo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twobraincells.com/2007/09/07/woooooo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shatner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twobraincells.com/2007/09/07/woooooo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woooooo.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=zLpLU7D7MWk"><strong>Woooooo.</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twobraincells.com/2007/09/07/woooooo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhoto Quick Tour pays tribute to Seinfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/11/04/iphoto-quick-tour-pays-tribute-to-seinfeld/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/11/04/iphoto-quick-tour-pays-tribute-to-seinfeld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/11/04/iphoto-quick-tour-pays-tribute-to-seinfeld/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPhoto Quick Tour pays tribute to Seinfeld. Choose the &#8220;Books Calendars Greeting Cards&#8221; segment, and about halfway through you&#8217;ll see someone creating a custom calendar item on 5 December called &#8216;Start of Festivus&#8217;. Festivus was presented in an episode of Seinfeld as a made-up, non-denominational, December-time holiday, and is now well-known as a Seinfeldism.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.apple.com/uk/ilife/quicktour/iphoto/">iPhoto Quick Tour</a></strong> pays tribute to Seinfeld. Choose the &#8220;Books Calendars Greeting Cards&#8221; segment, and about halfway through you&#8217;ll see someone creating a custom calendar item on 5 December called &#8216;Start of Festivus&#8217;. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus">Festivus</a> was presented in an episode of Seinfeld as a made-up, non-denominational, December-time holiday, and is now well-known as a Seinfeldism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/11/04/iphoto-quick-tour-pays-tribute-to-seinfeld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futurama Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/23/futurama-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/23/futurama-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/23/futurama-returns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters reports that at least 13 new episodes of Futurama will be produced, to air on Comedy Central in 2008. This is awesome.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Futurama gets new life" href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=televisionNews&#038;storyID=2006-06-23T033638Z_01_N22173912_RTRIDST_0_TELEVISION-FUTURAMA-DC.XML">Reuters reports</a> that at least 13 new episodes of <a title="IMDB - Futurama" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0149460/">Futurama</a> will be produced, to air on Comedy Central in 2008. This is awesome.<br />
<img alt="Zoidberg Jesus" id="image56" title="Zoidberg Jesus" src="http://www.twobraincells.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/zoidberg_jesus.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/23/futurama-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 24 clock</title>
		<link>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/18/the-24-clock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/18/the-24-clock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/18/the-24-clock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ever-so-slightly obsessive discussion of the typography of the digital clock in 24. The shock conclusion? &#8220;The onscreen time sequences are dictated partly by the typographic limitations of the clock font.&#8220;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.panopticist.com/archives/197.html">An ever-so-slightly obsessive discussion of the typography of the digital clock in <em>24</em>.</a> The shock conclusion? &#8220;<strong>The onscreen time sequences are dictated partly by the typographic limitations of the clock font.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twobraincells.com/2006/06/18/the-24-clock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
